Diversity is the New Tyranny

Have you ever thought about what exactly is society?

Although it’s not an authoritative source I thought the description on Wikipedia was pretty good.

A society is a group of individuals involved in persistent social interaction, or a large social group sharing the same spatial or social territory, typically subject to the same political authority and dominant cultural expectations.

Societies are characterised by patterns of relationships (social relations) between individuals who share a distinctive culture and institutions; a given society may be described as the sum total of such relationships among its constituent of members.

That pretty much sums us up - a group of individuals involved in persistent social interaction, sharing the same territory, political authority and cultural expectations.

At least it used to.

After decades of radical Leftist activism, where we co-exist now, bears little resemblance to that description. Instead we are becoming a nation of tribes, subject to different rules based around creed, colour, privilege or gender.

Those rules frame our culture and institutions and so, as the rules change to be exclusionary rather than inclusive so do our relationships.

When you really come down to it, we often don’t even share the same spatial territory any more.

Sure, we, as citizens of a nation,  share common land but it is increasingly siloed into our tribal groups.

The aboriginals have ‘their lands’ which others need permission to enter. That’s just one example but the tribalism is evident in the clusters of ethnic, right around the country, where language and customs can be very different.

One area that springs to mind is Lakemba in Western Sydney but you’ll find similar but different clusters right around the country.

Some may see this ‘diversity’ within our nation as a strength.

You’ll have to make your own mind up on that, but to me, it doesn’t fit the bill of a broader definition of a society that results in a strong and cohesive nation.

It’s much the same with the rule of law.

We have the common law, tribal law and religious law all operating overtly or covertly in this country.

Some observers might even conclude that, in some instances, crimes by certain groups appear to pursued less vigorously than if they’d been committed by members of a different group.

We have punishments influenced by the application of these external legal codes, cultural factors, race or gender.

While we currently have a common political authority, the tribalists want that to change, pushing for special political considerations for certain groups.

The ‘voice to parliament’ is one of those proposals.

Even our  institutions treat our tribes differently.

The welfare system provides for certain benefits based on religious and racial grounds. So does the education system, the health system and the legal system

There are even those within our society advocating for direct discrimination on the basis of gender, sexual preference, identity or skin colour.

This would normally be illegal but in this case, the discrimination is only targeted at white, heterosexual males. Apparently that makes it ok.

Here’s a recent job advertisement for an Australian Ambassador for some Australians.

Not only will the new  Ambassador only represent some of us, only a tiny section of our citizenry are able to apply for the job.

Apply that logic across any other ‘societal group’ and you’d almost certainly  be hauled before a court.

That glaring double standard can also be applied to our media coverage.

One pundit on Twitter replaced the word whiteness in newspaper headlines with the word jewish.

Why does the former go unquestioned while the latter prompts the deserved outrage.

Instead, we should be appalled by any racist headline but apparently some of us have different standards applied than others.

Of course this is not just happening in Australia. It’s taking place right around the western world where the results are also the same, or worse.

Societies are increasingly fractured and divided by race, politics, creed and colour.

Unfortunately, America - land of the free is leading the way.

While they are airbrushing it from history, during the BLM protest of a couple of years ago, violence and looting was out of control.

Instead of condemning these riots, politicians and businesses fell over themselves to show their support.

Virtue signallers were taking a knee and violent drug users had portraits painted in their honour.

The current US Vice President, Kamala Harris was even raising money to raise bail for an assortment of hard core criminals.

Some of those involved in these protests, often under the ANTIFA brand,  even took over sections of cities declaring them autonomous zones. Others, like me call them lawless blocks of degenerate scumbags.

Again, you can make up your own mind

Of course this constant assault on our traditions, way of life, culture and values comes at a high price.

Have a look at this video.

It’s embarrassing on so many levels.

Firstly, the colour of your skin is nothing one should be proud about. You’re born that way and whatever pride you have should be about your achievement, not something you were born with.

You certainly shouldn’t be ashamed of your birthright no matter what characteristics it gives you.

But aside from that, how is it that our ‘society’ has affirmed the righteousness of one section of the community to be proud of skin colour but cowed the others into quite obvious shame?

This balkanisation of western society knows no limits.

That’s my assessment anyway when confronted with this spectacular new ‘diversity’ flag being pushed by Microsoft.

According to the company:

This flag combines 40 different flags from LGBTQIA+ communities around the world, including: Abrosexual, Aceflux, Agender, Ambiamorous, Androgynous, Aroace, Aroflux, Aromantic, Asexual, Bigender, Bisexual, Demifluid, Demigender, Demigirl, Demiromantic, Demisexual, Gay/MLM/Vinician, Genderfluid, Genderflux, Genderqueer, Gender questioning, Graysexual, Intersex, Lesbian, Maverique, Neutrois, Nonbinary, Omnisexual, Pangender, Pansexual, Polyamorous, Polysexual, Transgender, Trigender, Two Spirit, Progress Pride, Queer, Unlabeled.

To me it looks more like a multi-coloured descent into societal madness.

And one pundit noted that the most common colour in the flag is white, while brown is the least common colour. Make of that what you will.

This division isn’t new. It’s not even inadvertent.

It’s the product of fostering a culture of divide between oppressors and the oppressed, starting nearly a century ago at the Frankfurt School of Social Theory in 1929

It’s not as if it wasn’t even predictable.

The great Jordan Peterson spoke about where we were heading years ago.

Today, the self-professed diversity advocates are the new tyrants.

They are deliberately eroding our civilisational structures because they want to break down our society.

The greatest shame is that we are letting them.